Source notes / current evidence

Annotate the authority beside the decision it informs.

Official material should enter the service blueprint with a question, access date, responsible reviewer, conclusion, and technical effect. A link alone does not determine what applies to a particular organisation.

Swedish Authority for Privacy Protection — IMYUse current IMY material to inform questions about privacy, personal-data roles, processing, tracking, rights, security, transfers, and official guidance.Agency for Digital Government — DiggConsult Digg's current public material when digital accessibility, public digital services, shared infrastructure, or government-service guidance matters to the scope.Swedish Civil Defence and Resilience AgencyUse the agency's current business-continuity and cyber-hygiene guidance to help the responsible organisation frame continuity, incident, dependency, and recovery questions.Swedish Tax Agency — SkatteverketDirect tax, VAT, registration, invoicing, and recordkeeping questions to current agency material; the organisation's appointed accountant or tax adviser owns the conclusion.

Margin: source

Save the official URL, relevant page, date accessed, language issue, and the exact project question.

Margin: interpretation

Name the authorised business owner or professional who decides applicability, uncertainty, and any required follow-up.

Margin: implementation

Write the approved requirement, technical owner, evidence, release effect, maintenance trigger, and date to recheck.

Official sites and guidance may change. Faith Forge Labs does not represent a Swedish authority, guarantee source completeness, or provide Swedish legal, tax, procurement, privacy, security, accessibility-certification, or regulatory advice.

Source-to-service note

Turn one approved conclusion into visible system behavior.

The useful output may be a content rule, interface choice, permission, workflow, supplier boundary, record, failure state, or acceptance test.

Create the decision note